I just heard an NPR announcer inadvertently laugh at Trump. They must have a very challenging job.
In other news, the tax plan could be worse. Obviously hard to evaluate without details, but it seems like there's some good and some bad. The good: eliminating most itemized deductions (that mostly help the wealthy), reducing headline corporate tax rates, increasing the standard deduction significantly, etc. The bad: eliminating the estate tax, probably not eliminating enough corporate tax deductions to offset the rate decrease, making the brackets for individuals too chunky, and not beefing up rules to keep individuals from incorporating to get the new 15% rate. It's probably not revenue neutral, which I'm not a bit fan of, but without detailed scoring it's hard to know how bad it would be.
Doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of making it through Congress, though.
"When I meet God, I am going to ask him two questions: Why relativity? And why turbulence? I really believe he will have an answer for the first." - Werner Heisenberg (maybe)
Why not? The GOP control Congress and that seems to tick a lot of GOP boxes. Take the estate tax, you think it's bad to eliminate it (and I agree), but the "death tax" has long been hated by the GOP in Congress. It's almost as if that's been thrown in to smooth its ride on a partisan basis.
"When I meet God, I am going to ask him two questions: Why relativity? And why turbulence? I really believe he will have an answer for the first." - Werner Heisenberg (maybe)
In case you weren't paying attention during the Trumpcare caust, the High Fructose Caucus and the so-called moderate Republican caucus in the House have wildly separate ideas on what is good and what is of Satan. Then there's the Senate on top of that. I'm sure Wiggin has a more verbose take.
In the future, the Berlin wall will be a mile high, and made of steel. You too will be made to crawl, to lick children's blood from jackboots. There will be no creativity, only productivity. Instead of love there will be fear and distrust, instead of surrender there will be submission. Contact will be replaced with isolation, and joy with shame. Hope will cease to exist as a concept. The Earth will be covered with steel and concrete. There will be an electronic policeman in every head. Your children will be born in chains, live only to serve, and die in anguish and ignorance.
The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.
The GOP has controlled Congress for a while. Ryan in particular is a budget and tax wonk and has been working for years to try and get superior versions of this passed by Congress. He hasn't managed it. Trump hasn't created enough political capital on the Hill to try and persuade/push Congress-critters where Ryan was not able to.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
They don't control enough of the Senate.
Hope is the denial of reality
The President has political capital (even if it is isn't much in Trump's case) and powers of patronage and bargaining etc that people like Ryan do not. I think having a President who opposes Ryan and a President who agrees with him should make a difference.
Though it may not be enough of a difference.
[QUOTE=RandBlade;187602]The President has political capital (even if it is isn't much in Trump's case)/quote]
He does have some, yes. You'll note that what I said is that he doesn't have ENOUGH.
Ryan actually has substantial powers for patronage and bargaining as Speaker himself.and powers of patronage and bargaining etc that people like Ryan do not.
It could. But is this a President who agrees with Ryan or is this a President who is ignoring Ryan and pushing his own new (and nowhere near as thoroughly researched and prepped) plan? Looks like the latter to me. Trump isn't helping Ryan get his reforms passed, he's doing the exact same things he did elsewhere, muscling around as the new Big Cheese and expecting them to fall into line because they're Washington insiders and he was elected to be an outsider.I think having a President who opposes Ryan and a President who agrees with him should make a difference.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
Rand is also forgetting one key fact: a president's leverage vis-a-vis Congress comes mainly from his popular support. Trump has 40% approval.
Hope is the denial of reality
I thought how approval was still very high among Republican voters.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Lower than in Bush's first term.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/203198/pr...ald-trump.aspx
http://www.gallup.com/poll/116500/pr...orge-bush.aspx
Hope is the denial of reality
He can always redefine "substantiatial".
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
No it isn't...I don't stand by anything. Narcissism is strong with this one.
This is real, right?
Faith is Hope (see Loki's sig for details)
If hindsight is 20-20, why is it so often ignored?
“It will allow insurance companies to require people who have higher health care costs to contribute more to the insurance pool that helps offset all these costs, thereby reducing the cost to those people who lead good lives, they’re healthy, they’ve done the things to keep their bodies healthy,” explained Brooks. “And right now, those are the people who have done things the right way that are seeing their costs skyrocketing.”
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...able-care.html
That's the modern GOP in a nutshell. If you get sick, it's because of your lifestyle. In which case, you should probably go in a ditch somewhere and die.
Hope is the denial of reality
My non smoking non drinking mom's 6 year battle with throat cancer was totally a result of her lifestyle
Same goes for my dad and his rectal cancer that so wiped out my parents savings that my mom lost her house after he died.
GOP is controlled and supported by assholes, murderous assholes.
"In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
I'm not forcing anyone to do anything. If enough people banded together and decided it was important enough they could be cared for.
That being said, the genie is out of the bottle now. We aren't going to be able to politically make pre-existing conditions un-coverable. But we certainly can *and should* charge people more for unhealthy behavior. Just like you would charge someone more for car insurance if they keep getting speed tickets.
Except the GOP is conflating unhealthy behavior with illness as a way to justify screwing the seriously sick. All while opposing abortion, I should note. You don't see how evil it is to force someone to give birth to a severely disabled child and then refuse to provide the mother and child sufficient healthcare coverage?
Incidentally, how many people have to band together to do this in a place like North Carolina, one of the most gerrymandered states in the country?
Hope is the denial of reality
You keep trying to broaden the argument further. I've already said the genie is out of the bottle, we aren't going back to the way it was before. I also don't care what the latest push that probably won't amount to anything, that the GOP is currently doing. I'm asking from an insurance/policy perspective do you think people who deliberately make unhealthy choices should pay higher premiums? People choose to smoke, they choose to be fat. Just like people choose to speed and choose to drive while intoxicated. Why are you so you opposed to it?
The answer to that would be that though the principle sounds reasonable it's actually the individual evaluation which makes the difference. How does your argument of choice holds up for a morbidly obese young adult? The 'choices' leading to the condition there are not so unequivocally those of the person who is made responsible.
But let's say you are right; why no higher premiums for people who drive cars, work in office jobs, have children or live in multi-storey houses? The health risks these people take on a daily basis surely are big enough to warrant a healthy surcharge on their premiums.
Congratulations America