Wiggins is right. The surprise is how much help Rubio got from the surge in caucus-goers and late-deciders. Trump led polls sure but the pundits kept repeating that the Iowa caucus just doesn't poll well for a reason. As it is, second is a perfectly good result for Trump. Not what he wanted certainly but since he didn't take the traditional stump for the state and relied on new caucusers breaking his way in contravention of the wisdom that many stay undecided until late, it's actually higher than I might have thought. It's New Hampshire that will tell us if Trumps' polling numbers are off for some reason.