That's a petty and uncharitable claim considering his next paragraph. Lewk pretty clearly is not saying he wants to use that word, he seems to be saying he thinks it is dumb for anyone to use that word. Further, there should not be protected subgroups who may or may not be able to use it acceptably depending on how the prevailing winds of social justice are blowing. That strikes me as a topic worthy of debate, even if I don't necessarily agree with it, and not an indication that Lewk is somehow chomping at the bit to use offensive language and being prevented by doing so by liberal outrage.