An AIDS drug is a drug that is used to treat AIDS.
An AIDS drug is a drug that is used to treat AIDS.
There isn't a treatment for AIDS. HIV is a disease, AIDS is not. An AIDS drug is a drug used to manage the AIDS condition, including treating/mitigating the opportunistic infections arising from that condition. Of which Toxo is the single most common. The drugs we use in chemotherapy are cancer drugs. They're also used in treating other conditions. That doesn't mean they suddenly aren't cancer drugs.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
AIDS is not 'autoimmune diseases'. It stands for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. It is most definitely not related to treatments for autoimmune diseases, which generally involve suppressing the (over)action of the immune system in some way.
Rather, AIDS is the collection of symptoms and diseases that typically arise following an untreated HIV infection, mostly as a result of the completely absent immune system in untreated HIV-infected patients. It was first described when physicians noticed groups of young, otherwise healthy patients coming into the hospital with extremely rare or unlikely diseases. Eventually, the cause of AIDS was proven to be the destruction of the immune system secondary to infection with the newly discovered HIV retrovirus.
Fuzzy's point is that one of the largest current-day patient populations that need drugs to treat toxoplasmosis infection are those suffering from AIDS (toxo is rarely dangerous except in people with compromised immune systems). Thus, it is hardly a misnomer (though certainly less than precise) to call the drug in question an 'AIDS drug', though it can obviously be used to treat toxo infections in the broader population.
"When I meet God, I am going to ask him two questions: Why relativity? And why turbulence? I really believe he will have an answer for the first." - Werner Heisenberg (maybe)
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
Feel free to post your opinions, Fuzzy. You're a gay male twin, living on the west coast.
The queen of non-sequitur strikes again.
Hope is the denial of reality
I am literally at a loss for words.
"When I meet God, I am going to ask him two questions: Why relativity? And why turbulence? I really believe he will have an answer for the first." - Werner Heisenberg (maybe)
Come on GGT you know better than to try to trick Fuzzy into making an unnecessarily personal/private comment see above for clarification re. definitions too.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Yeah, I shouldn't have gotten into a semantics argument (between aggie and fuzzy) about what's a disease and whether pharmaceuticals treat or cure. I also shouldn't have made a personal comment to you, Fuzzy, and I'm sorry for that. Also sorry for appealing to emotions, in an attempt to get back to what *rent-seeking in modern pharmaceutical markets* means to begin with. Mea Culpa.
The truth is....there IS an emotional component to any debate about medicine and healthcare, because it impacts human lives. There's been a political component over history, too....where government funds for R & D have been attached to the "moral values" of taxpayers. And in the US it's common to be emotional about the morality of public policy and tax dollars.