Your tax dollars at work - Sex Ed as a criminal enterprise.

[CitizenCain]

http://content.usatoday.com/communit...x-ed-classes/1

Wis. prosecutor: Teachers risk arrest over new sex-ed classes

A Wisconsin district attorney has warned schools in his county that if they proceed with new state sex-education courses, teachers could face criminal charges for encouraging minors to have sex, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports.

Juneau County District Attorney Scott Southworth said a new state law that requires students learn to use condoms and other contraceptives "promotes the sexualization — and sexual assault — of our children." In his March 24 letter to five school districts, Southworth, a Republican, said teachers could be charged with contributing to the delinquency of minors. He urged school officials to suspend the program, which takes effect in the fall, and transfer the anatomy curriculum to a science course.

Here are a couple of excerpts from his letter:

"If a teacher instructs any student aged 16 or younger how to utilize contraceptives under circumstances where the teacher knows the child is engaging in sexual activity with another child -- or even where the 'natural and probable consequences' of the teacher's instruction is to cause that child to engage in sexual intercourse with a child -- that teacher can be charged under this statute" of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. ...

"Forcing our schools to instruct children on how to utilize contraceptives encourages our children to engage in sexual behavior, whether as a victim or an offender," he wrote. "It is akin to teaching children about alcohol use, then instructing them on how to make mixed alcoholic drinks."

He said in an interview with the Journal Sentinel that he could not say how likely he would be to file charges, saying it would depend on the specifics of any case.

"I'm not looking to charge any teachers," he said. "I've got enough work to do."

The paper spoke to a co-author of the legislation. She called the DA's letter "irresponsible" and said it was "laughable to think teachers could be charged for telling students how to use contraception."

"Using condoms isn't a crime for anyone," said Rep. Kelda Helen Roys, D-Madison. "This guy is not a credible legal source on this matter, I'm sorry to say. His purpose is to intimidate and create enough panic in the minds of school administrators that they'll turn their backs on young people and their families."

The new law continues to let parents remove their children from sex-ed classes, and schools can also not offer such instruction. One district that received the letter said it had not taught sex ed for years.

(Posted by Michael Winter)

With assholes like this in government, it's enough to make me wonder if there's ever a reason good enough to justify new legislation, when the laws already on the books are so open to abuse and misinterpretation.

[Dreadnaught]

Unless the law is somehow horrendously worded, this sounds like a major judicial oversight. What kind of organization do you think would organize a freedom ride to Wisconsin to teach sex-ed in an open air field?

I got sex ed in fracking 6th grade when I was 10-11. And again in 8th grade when I was 13. If I hadn't known jack when it was useful (16), I would have been screwed. Or not screwed.

[CitizenCain]

Unless the law is somehow horrendously worded, this sounds like a major judicial oversight.

Maybe. Then again, I lost what little faith I had in the judiciary when the SCOTUS declared that WalMart could use eminent domain to replace my house with a parking lot.

[Dreadnaught]

I think that's going to be one of those decisions that gets reversed and regretted. Or at least I hope.

Plus, SCOTUS is different than a half-brained elected county attorney general.