When the sky above us fell
We descended into hell
Into kingdom come
I confess am not super familiar with how they are depicted, or even if/or what stereotypes there are to be followed. I think what I was more trying to get at is we, (from my interpretation of the general views of forum members) aren't terribly offended by an individual's sexual preferences, (obviously not including pedophilia but certainly up to and including those who are attracted to woman with larger breasts, or hot man on man action) but many do have fairly strong opinions about how games are marketed, or characters within those games portrayed. I'm not sure I am certain why that distinction exists.
Last edited by Enoch the Red; 07-22-2016 at 06:05 PM.
So, what's the issue?
When the sky above us fell
We descended into hell
Into kingdom come
Big breasts apparently.
"Wer Visionen hat, sollte zum Arzt gehen." - Helmut Schmidt
Sure, why not?
Well that would depend on the solidity and accuracy of the opinion. You're not trying to claim we should accept or refuse claims based on the person making them, are you? Because I'm pretty sure you know the word for that.Or, rather, what is the weight and value of those opinions, and why should they be taken seriously? Should those opinions influence the producers of gay porn?
Last edited by LittleFuzzy; 07-23-2016 at 02:53 AM.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
I don't think anyone should be forced to accept or refuse opinion based claims based solely on any single criteria. Opinions are cheap. Similarly, I don't think producers would do well to ignore their target audience, or make a game they aren't interested in making in order to appease scorn from individuals who may have an agenda, or those who desire content that is not in the interest of the creator or the intended audience. My opinion on what would make good pornography, or a good game is likely very different from yours, or Minx's, or Loki's. I am not trying to invalidate their enjoyment of their favorite pornography or game because it may not appeal to me. I don't feel the need, nor do I see the value in being critical of others leisure activities that in no way impact me. Which is likely why this is the first time I have seen the characters that Loki and Ominous posted. It doesn't seem like a type of game that would naturally interest me. That does not mean that the game is entirely without merit, that people who enjoy or create it are sexists, or that it is wrong that the characters were designed the way they were. I don't need to discredit other people's enjoyment of their chosen media in order to make myself feel better, or stoke Internet outrage.
Last edited by Enoch the Red; 07-23-2016 at 08:46 AM.
No, I said "if you have something to say, say it here". Telling me to watch random YouTube videos that he's not linked to from here, or read random stuff I'm supposed to find myself that he's not linked to, neither of those are engaging IMO.
If I find something elsewhere I agree with and/or find interesting then I post it here. Either copy/paste text, or embed video. I don't say "go find this and read it".
Let me help you out RB. One of the heroes for people like Aimless is this moron. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Sarkeesian
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/8-...-like-a-dummy/
Some of the more stupid quotes are the tired line of video games causing shootings, bashing games that she obviously hasn't played and the suggestion of guilty over innocent standard when it comes to female harassment complaints.