You're not allowed to fly too low over a congested area.
You're not allowed to fly too low over a congested area.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
If this is the reason, and not Minx's point regarding aviation rules, I am still not entirely sure I understand. Do the police investigate any type of speech if they come from vile racist hate groups? If they handed out a pamphlet would that also require an investigation by the police?
And again I really don't understand British COVID restrictions - why would a private flight, (in what looks like a one or two seater aircraft) violate COVID restrictions?
Only if the pamphlet broke the law.
I was guessing but as it stands (and it keeps evolving) it's only legal to leave your home for a few valid reasons. Eg to go to work, to go shopping, to exercise etc
To fly a plane carrying a banner isn't likely covered under any of them. Neither to be fair is protesting. However on another site I discuss politics on someone suggested the pilot etc were probably paid to carry the banner in which case that would be covered.
Gotten to the bottom of this.
An investigation was prompted because there was a complaint. If someone complains the Police are duty bound to investigate.
The investigation has already been closed. The Police have already said no law was broken.
Someone elsewhere said that putting in a complaint is an old journalistic trick to make a story seem bigger than it is. The Police report they're investigating, makes the story seem big, then nobody bothers to report the results of the investigation.
That is absolutely the way to do it. In fact, it's pretty much the only way to do it.
A few weeks of protests have done more to advance the cause of police accountability than decades of trying to work within the system, where the only solution those enlightened centrists will countenance has been to add more rules and regulations which the police either work around or outright ignore, or giving them more training which they disregard and mock.
When the sky above us fell
We descended into hell
Into kingdom come
The man who was shot near Wendy's was not unarmed.
He resisted, took police taser and while he was running he aimed taser towards police and police fired.
Was it justified? Yes. If taser hits, the escaping man could take downed police gun and kill the police.
It was self defense.
I watched the bodycam video and Weindy's video.
Are we talking about the same event?
Freedom - When people learn to embrace criticism about politicians, since politicians are just employees like you and me.
Tossing sandwich while black = death sentence
https://www.metrotimes.com/news-hits...lawsuit-states
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Grand jury indicts three men in Ahmaud Arbery murder case:
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/24/u...ent/index.html
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
You've already been told. Now go sit in a corner, you dull-witted jackass.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
But Steely don't you understand he owned you so hard
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Fundamentally, yes, because he's got my quibbling about riots when the vast majority of what's happening is peaceful protest until such time as the police escalate the situation by attacking the crowd.
Compare that to their conduct when people were protesting social distancing earlier in May if you want to see what "Rules for thee but not for me" actually looks like.
When the sky above us fell
We descended into hell
Into kingdom come
If you support blowing up buildings full of people for one cause
https://images.app.goo.gl/Dphf81U5YP4sQzjZ6
you must support it also for causes you disagree with
https://images.app.goo.gl/2w7a7PPikG22eyjB7
False syllogism. Your logic is faulty.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
Nice try but you know where you went wrong.
When there is a political debate about what policies, rules and laws we should live by, each side should be heard. Before you sit down to play the game, each side should be adhering to certain standards generally mutually agreed upon. This is the basis of civil society. To say that only your side can do certain things is an affront to the political process and the very basis of civilization. We don't beat each other with sticks, we don't agree "might makes right" we debate, discuss and then vote.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
When the sky above us fell
We descended into hell
Into kingdom come
In tiny numbers. Being unarmed and getting killed by the police wouldn't even make the top 50 most common types of deaths. And in many cases when cases have gone to to trial either the grand jury fails to indict or the jury doesn't convict. Upset about a jury decision so you riot? That's not civilization. Besides if they were truly upset about the state doing this why aren't they protesting outside the homes of their local leadership? These cities have been controlled by Democrats often times for decades.
Y'all mfers killed hundreds of thousands and fucked up global security for two decades over a "tiny" number of people who were killed, so why change a winning formula?
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Black Lives Matter protesters kneel outside governor's mansion in AlbanyBesides if they were truly upset about the state doing this why aren't they protesting outside the homes of their local leadership? These cities have been controlled by Democrats often times for decades.
When the sky above us fell
We descended into hell
Into kingdom come