Well indeed. There's a black man running, go get your guns Bubba.Originally Posted by Hazir
Yeah racism wasn't involved . . .
Well indeed. There's a black man running, go get your guns Bubba.
Yeah racism wasn't involved . . .
Quit believing fake news and actually look up the facts of the story.
You mean the fact that numerous people were caught on tape in the construction zone, but the white posse only chose to lynch the black one?
Hope is the denial of reality
Why would you lynch white men for a misdemeanor?
Only blacks should be lynched for misdemeanors.
Again wrong, black men deserve to be lynched for no good reason whatsoever.
White men who kill black men should either not be prosecuted at all or acquitted by a jury of their peers.
Congratulations America
A one man lesson on how Jim Crow worked.
Hope is the denial of reality
Because he matched the description of the suspect in recent thefts. There's a 911 tape of it from before that day's incident if you want to actually understand the situation. Y'all are completely ignoring the context of why they were bothering in the first place.
Matched description = black.
Hope is the denial of reality
Maybe age? Clothing? Hair? Gender? Might as well claim these guys were sexist against men.
Twitter Link
I wonder if this guy has a criminal record and therefore deserves lynching according to your Jim Crow logic.
Hope is the denial of reality
Fuck her honestly. This is why we shouldn't "#believewomen" by default when it comes to making accusations.
A) it was already demonstrated that there were no recent thefts the way you're trying to allege. The only alleged theft was the missing gun of one of the shooters. B) if the kid had actually matched the description then it further proves this was a lynching because that shooter already knew who the kid was. If he could recognize him from this alleged prior theft he would have been able to identify him and there would have been an id and not just a supposed "matched description." Unless it's either a lie or they deliberately withheld that intending to chase and lynch the kid later. C) even if what you're trying to claim was true it further proves this was racism and a premeditated lynching because one of the murderers was a former peace officer and a former investigator with the prosecutor's office which meant he damn well knew what the requirements for a citizen's arrest were and that the situation didn't meet them when they gave chase. It was a premeditated crime.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
The problem here is that you can try to distance yourself from her, but that she actually is living proof of the fact how institutional racism isn't only rampant, but that it is actively used as a threath against black men.
Congratulations America
Holy shit, that is terrifying. That woman is trying to get him killed.
The Rules
Copper- behave toward others to elicit treatment you would like (the manipulative rule)
Gold- treat others how you would like them to treat you (the self regard rule)
Platinum - treat others the way they would like to be treated (the PC rule)
Tell me - what happened to the guy?
She got doxxed. Lost her dog and is on administrative leave from her rather fancy job.
Yet another hero for Lewk: https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/minne...121847324.html
Hope is the denial of reality
For all she knew he could've been trying to poison her dog, she would've been fully justified in shooting him if they'd been in some shithole southern state.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
She actually used this excuse in her fake as shit apology.
"In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."
Minneapolis police murder a man in broad daylight:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/minneap...neck-man-died/
This officer belongs in jail. He should lose any savings he may have amassed as well as his freedom.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
When will black folks wake up that white liberals just use them for votes? Early reports are showing that she regularly donates to Democrats.She reminds me of Hillary’s KKK mentor.
Not going to start a thread justifying the death of the man in Minneapolis? I bet he had a criminal record.
Hope is the denial of reality
It's important not to take Lewk seriously; rather, treat him like the contemptible little cretin that he is—it's the only way he can get off.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
You and yours always make up this crap. You invent criminal records and financial paper trails that don't exist.When will black folks wake up that white liberals just use them for votes? Early reports are showing that she regularly donates to Democrats.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices...-a9533581.html
What an amazing insight, Lewk. The fact there are indeed liberals who are racist is a reason why African Americans should seriously consider a party that still glorifies the Confederate cause in the Civil War.
Hope is the denial of reality
There is absolutely no indication what or where this supposed information is or came from, no sources provided. If you'd actually read the article, underneath the fold it tells us straight that the alleged "leaked info" can't be connected to THIS particular person at all and that it's just statistically more likely for her to be Dem because more New Yorkers are Dem than Republican. That's a tabloid journalist classic to protect themselves from libel claims when they make stuff up. You search for this sort of fiction and instantly use to dismiss anything you don't want to hear, before even applying a second's critical thought to the material.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
Matching the description isn't good enough for a lynching. Matching a description means pass those details on to the Police.
"Young black man with black hair [I'm guessing]" = Kill him! Only to Lewk is that not racism or murder.
The justification for shooting was that he went for the gun. You continue to insist that they went out to kill him. If that were the case why didn't they run him over? Why didn't they shoot at him during the 4 minute chase? You are so insistent that the facts fit the way you first viewed the story that you refuse to see any other potential scenario.
He had the right to go for a gun, he was the one being attacked. He had the right to self-defence.
They instigated this crime. They were the criminals not the victim of the chase.
Are you suggesting if someone attacks you and you reach for a gun to defend yourself that the attacker can kill you?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote