Quote Originally Posted by Aimless View Post
I agree with B - D, while I believe her influence, though substantial, is not enough to rein in the military or sufficiently sway public opinion in Burma. I just don't see how her taking a moral stand would change anything for the Rohingya or, indeed, anyone else. I would like for her to take a moral stand. Perhaps it might even have a small impact on public opinion outside Burma. But is her integrity crucial? I don't know. I am more concerned by the milquetoast response from Western countries.
She's by far the most popular person in the country. If anyone can persuade the public, it's her. But of course she doesn't want to, because she supports these actions.

You're more concerned at the lack of an international reaction than you are at the ethnic cleansing itself? Really?