Quote Originally Posted by LittleFuzzy View Post
Because I wasn't just talking about sovereignty, but who is harmed by redress. The vast bulk of the federal land in the US? It's in the west and is not occupied, under lease to someone, etc. It is unused except for various individuals taking advantage of free or overlooked commons. It does not negatively impact US citizens in any real way to hand it back over, they are not being harmed in turn, which would not be defensible since those directly involved are long-dead.
Still the steal more, keep more principle applies.