If by any examples you mean the single example that was provided by OG, then sure, I've quibbled and wriggled my way out of them all. I'm not quite sure I understand or appreciate your animosity, and I'm sorry you seem to feel as though further discussion would be unproductive. That was hardly my intent, though you clearly feel otherwise. For what it is worth, my mind is hardly made up. I have quite strong opinions about liberty and the second amendment, but would be open to legislation that would more proactively and aggressively keep guns out of the hands of felons, domestic abusers, and the dangerously mentally ill. A view which I believe is likely shared by most Americans, left, right, and center. The devil, as always, seems to be in the details. I don't believe the Obama rule that was presented as evidence in this thread would have been a good or effective rule; it represented an incredibly small population, many of which are likely not dangerous in any meaningful way, and would have prevented few if any of the mass shootings that I can think of, but maybe I'm missing something.