Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Guns vs. Federalism

  1. #1
    SEÑOR Member Aimless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,447

    Default Guns vs. Federalism

    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/0...ciprocity.html

    Don't worry, they'll make some exceptions for black people.
    “Humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries, but in how those discoveries are applied to reduce inequity.”
    — Bill Gates

  2. #2
    How shit, this would be a nightmare for those fleeing abusive relationships.
    "In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."

  3. #3
    Local talking head LittleFuzzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,494
    <--not a fan of the NYT new paywall block
    Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"

  4. #4
    SEÑOR Member Aimless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,447
    Open in incognito tab.
    “Humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries, but in how those discoveries are applied to reduce inequity.”
    — Bill Gates

  5. #5
    All Worship Ragnarök Loki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    16,244
    ScriptSafe. Just saying.
    Hope is the denial of reality

  6. #6
    Senior Member Enoch the Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,103
    As little as I worry about the fears expressed in the article, and by opponents to this legislation in general, (someone who is looking to stalk, abuse, or kill their significant other is likely not going to be a stickler about adhering to local, state, or federal laws, with regard to concealed carry or otherwise), I still can't muster support for this bill. As much as I like the idea of being able to carry in states where I am currently prohibited from doing so, this does seem to be the wrong way of doing that. I like federalism. I want states to be able to experiment and try new things, and what works for Montana might not work for New York. The reverse is also true.
    Last edited by Enoch the Red; 12-07-2017 at 09:59 AM.

  7. #7
    Local talking head LittleFuzzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,494
    The first problem that came to my mind is that there is no national database or registry for these permits which means local police will have an aggravating time just checking out whether someone actually does have a legitimate permit or not. Some states make it a matter of public record, others do not. Finding the right agency to contact is a burden just by itself. And then, some states don't even maintain a database for their own permits. You might as well just legislate that a permit is not required for concealed carry in any of the 50 states.
    Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"

  8. #8
    Senior Member Enoch the Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleFuzzy View Post
    The first problem that came to my mind is that there is no national database or registry for these permits which means local police will have an aggravating time just checking out whether someone actually does have a legitimate permit or not. Some states make it a matter of public record, others do not. Finding the right agency to contact is a burden just by itself. And then, some states don't even maintain a database for their own permits. You might as well just legislate that a permit is not required for concealed carry in any of the 50 states.
    I actually don't think this is as technically difficult a process as you do. My current permit is reciprocated by a majority of the states, and police there already have a way of identifying whether or not it is valid. As far as I know l, (I'll try and remember to ask one of my friends in law enforcement to be sure) validating it is pretty much a call to dispatch away.
    Last edited by Enoch the Red; 12-07-2017 at 03:07 AM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member GGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,113
    If you have to ask "a friend in law enforcement", there's a problem right there

  10. #10
    Senior Member Enoch the Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by GGT View Post
    If you have to ask "a friend in law enforcement", there's a problem right there
    Why is that?

  11. #11
    Senior Member GGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,113
    Because that means "the process" is more difficult than you presume

    And for the most part, gun legislation/regulation is mostly about "the process"

  12. #12
    Senior Member Enoch the Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by GGT View Post
    Because that means "the process" is more difficult than you presume

    And for the most part, gun legislation/regulation is mostly about "the process"
    I am not following. Imperfect knowledge of a process I only have tangential knowledge and experience with is completely unrelated to the difficulty of that process. I also have only a cursory knowledge of how license, registration, and insurance statuses are checked across state lines, but I somehow doubt they are a major headache for police officers.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Enoch the Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Enoch the Red View Post
    As far as I know l, (I'll try and remember to ask one of my friends in law enforcement to be sure) validating it is pretty much a call to dispatch away.
    It looks like it varies on the state of the CCW holder. For the police officer that I've spoken to, when he runs the DL# it will return whether or not the have a valid carry permit. For states that it does not show up on, it would require a call to dispatch who would handle the validation process.

  14. #14
    SEÑOR Member Aimless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,447
    For some people the only call made will be for an ambulance.
    “Humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries, but in how those discoveries are applied to reduce inequity.”
    — Bill Gates

  15. #15
    Senior Member Enoch the Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Aimless View Post
    For some people the only call made will be for an ambulance.
    This is sadly true. What to do with that information, I don't know.

  16. #16
    Administrator Dreadnaught's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,168
    Quote Originally Posted by Enoch the Red View Post
    As little as I worry about the fears expressed in the article, and by opponents to this legislation in general, (someone who is looking to stalk, abuse, or kill their significant other is likely not going to be a stickler about adhering to local, state, or federal laws, with regard to concealed carry or otherwise), I still can't muster support for this bill. As much as I like the idea of being able to carry in states where I am currently prohibited from doing so, this does seem to be the wrong way of doing that. I like federalism. I want states to be able to experiment and try new things, and what works for Montana might not work for New York. The reverse is also true.
    Same. And I think pushing for this kind of legislation on guns will simply federalize the issue further.

    Also the guy in the article photo could use some work on his target practice. Though we all know handguns are tough sometimes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •