Let’s make it even more simple.
Mueller removed him. Binary situation here.
A. It was appropriate to remove him.
B. It was inappropriate to remove him.
A or B?
We have freedom of speech, you can say 9/11 was right and proper and jihad is cool. But if you do, you should have a closer look taken at you. Would you agree? Because again, an investigation is not a government sanction. If you are jailed, fined etc that is government sanction.
It was appropriate to remove him from the investigation in order to avoid problems with the appearance of bias that may be highlighted by people who don't respect freedom of speech or the professionalism in organizations such as the FBI. It was inappropriate to throw him to the wolves before the matter was properly dealt with in an internal investigation, because his privately discussed opinions are perfectly legal.
Not long ago, the FBI was described as "Trumpland" by an agent, and multiple internal sources described a deep-seated bias, within the agency, against Clinton. By your reasoning, this bias should cast doubt on any investigation into Clinton's actions that may lead to an indictment. Is that what you're trying to argue?
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Actually yes, they both do. Typically, the direct evidence of wrong-doing is that an already committed wrong has already been uncovered. The police investigating a crime that has been committed, a congressional investigation looking into, say, confirmed attempts by a foreign power to manipulate a US election. You need a predicated act of wrong-doing to base an investigation on. You can't know where an investigation might lead, what other acts might be uncovered in the course of it and also pursued, but you need that first wrong-doing to start.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
Which is to say, Lewk believes that privately criticizing Trump is a crime.
Hope is the denial of reality
Must say, watching the board collectively come together to call a Lewk a dumbass really brings out that holiday cheer
"In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."
Lewk is not alone in this. Conservatives are starting to imply that what Strzok did may be grounds for firing him. Conservatives with large audiences are calling for the FBI to be "cleansed", in response to this story. Lewk may have his bizarre fetishes, but on this matter he's not an outlier. At best, these people are suggesting that Strzok should be sanctioned in various ways for tainting, with his mere involvement, a potential criminal investigation of great importance to national security. Trump's core voters are buying it.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
I presume the idea is that it's somehow criminal to influence a federal investigation due to personal bias.
Meanwhile, Lewk-endorsed state media is giving credence to the idea that Mueller obtaining transition-team emails from a govt. third party is illegal and possibly a sign of a coup being underway. A coup.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
The text on the banner wasn't in reference to anything Conway said. It was in reference to the hosts' comments:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qK590Y4NqyY&t=1m44s
The other links suggests that Fox and a growing number of GOP politicians are aligned on this matter.So the investigation in to Donald Trump’s campaign has been crooked from the jump. But the scary part is we may now have proof the investigation was weaponized to destroy his presidency for partisan political purposes. And to disenfranchise millions of American voters. Now, if that’s true, we have a coup on our hands in America. And Congress must force the FBI and the individuals involved to come clean on what counter-espionage agents meant by, “insurance policy” to “protect the country” from Donald Trump’s presidency.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Why would he plead the fifth?
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
You're getting confused, Lewk. You talked about a Congressional investigation and I replied on the same topic. Now you're talking about any committee meeting of any kind whatsoever. That's not the same topic. You show me where Congress has launched an investigation despite lacking any predicating wrong to prompt such an investigation in the first place.
Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"
Shadiest admin ever.
https://www.axios.com/jeff-sessions-...b81417eb1.html
Almost as disgusting as Nunes's antics with the propaganda memo.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Republican politicians, Fox and all their supporters... are... well.
https://twitter.com/MikeDelMoro/stat...36767384408069
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/full-...ry?id=52592241
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Can't decide of Republicans are genuinely that stupid or just think everyone else is.
Fucking "secret society".
Last edited by Steely Glint; 01-25-2018 at 06:02 PM.
When the sky above us fell
We descended into hell
Into kingdom come
Look at lewk. the answer is "both"
If that one is to easy, check dread's recent behavior in the NN thread.
Last edited by Ominous Gamer; 01-25-2018 at 12:43 PM.
"In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."
We'll see how it goes, more e-mails are going to come to light. I still want to see him justify some of the things we already know about. Preferably under oath.