You can get an idea:
No matter how you look at it, that's fucked up.Official figures on levels of representation are hard to come by, but in more than a fifth of the more than 1,500 immigration bail hearings monitored by the Bar Council last year, the applicant did not have a lawyer. In another study of more than 100 people in detention last autumn, by Bail for Immigration Detainees, 56% did not currently have a lawyer and almost a third had never had a lawyer while in detention. Fewer than a quarter of the detainees interviewed by BID had a solicitor funded by legal aid.
This is not an informative statistic tbh but if you want a rough idea of the situation for asylum seekers:What proportion of cases aren't appealed.
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...-protection-to
Of the 22,982 initial decisions on asylum applications from main applicants, 34% were grants of asylum or an alternative form of protection, compared to 38% in the previous year. A separate Home Office analysis shows that for the years 2013 to 2015, on average 37% of decisions were granted initially, but this proportion rose to 52% after appeal.
According to this close to 80% of refusals have been appealed in recent years:
http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.a...the-uk-asylum/
At least 68% refused in 2016, the majority of refusals appealed and 42% of appeals allowed.
This is extremely embarrassing.
Even more shameful:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ome-office-fix
Last edited by Aimless; 02-25-2018 at 09:29 AM.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."