Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Trump Tariffs

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member GGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,398

    Default Trump Tariffs

    20% on imported steel, 10% on imported aluminum. It was part of his "Make America Great Again" campaign. That got him elected, beginning with the RNC/GOP that nominated him as party leader. Oops?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Amsterdam/Istanbul
    Posts
    9,758
    I seriously think that the people who think this is really about him being angry about not being able to use the 'get out of NAFTA-card' to pressure Canada and Mexico into subservience have nailed it.
    Greece shows us that there is a kind of politician worse than the ones that break their election promises; the ones that keep their election promises.

  3. #3
    Senior Member GGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,398
    If so, that's a crazy way to "lead". Maybe it was timed to influence PA's special election tomorrow, who knows?

    I think Trump is stuck in the 80's, doesn't know much about history or policy-making, and views gov't like any other business deal (or reality TV show production). Or his personality traits (impulsive, emotional, egotistical) are "leading", which is just as crazy.

  4. #4
    Senior Member GGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,398
    China is responding with $3 billion tariffs on its US imports. They spend ~$1 billion just from our pork-producing states, which mostly voted for Trump.

    If this isn't officially an international Trade War, then what is it?

  5. #5
    Senior Member GGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,398
    Should have titled this Trump Tweets Twisted Tariffs and Trade Tirades

    So, after he threatened import tariffs on steel and aluminum, China called his bluff and threatened tariffs on US soybeans and pork, right? All sorts of countries were looking for special exemptions.

    NOW he's tweeting about bringing back jobs to ZTE! *China's #2 telecom that was sanctioned and fined for selling to Iran and North Korea, and its products banned from military bases for NATIONAL SECURITY reasons*! And he's 'instructing' Sec. of Commerce to "get it done", after already imposing sanctions and fines for its bad acts.

    But wait, there's more! This tariff retaliation goes beyond "negotiating" trade deals! Trump Org. was expecting a $500 million loan from Chinese banks for an interest in MNC Lido City in Jakarta (Trump golf course, Trump hotel branding). This is type of tit-for-tat isn't just ridiculous and obscene, it's dangerous. POTUS is actively intervening in law enforcement to satisfy a foreign government, and it's probably another example of violating the Emoluments Clause. Where the hell is oversight from congress?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,483
    I don't think this is going to generate much discussion. I don't think a single person on this board thinks Trump is doing right with his BS tariffs.

  7. #7
    SEÑOR Member Aimless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    13,154
    Apparently some think his tariff policy was worth it, you know, to own the libs.
    “Humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries, but in how those discoveries are applied to reduce inequity.”
    — Bill Gates

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,483
    Quote Originally Posted by Aimless View Post
    Apparently some think his tariff policy was worth it, you know, to own the libs.
    On the balance still better than Clinton. Barring nuclear war its hard to overstate how important the SCOTUS pick was. Or the tax cuts. Or the cutting of red tape and getting rid of bad regs. And yes, the tears of liberals.

  9. #9
    SEÑOR Member Aimless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    13,154
    Lewk, the more you try to explain why you think the erosion of core norms, US influence etc were worth it, the dumber and more degenerate you look. Just a heads up.
    “Humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries, but in how those discoveries are applied to reduce inequity.”
    — Bill Gates

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,483
    Quote Originally Posted by Aimless View Post
    Lewk, the more you try to explain why you think the erosion of core norms, US influence etc were worth it, the dumber and more degenerate you look. Just a heads up.
    You don't really seem to understand how critical that justice pick was. There were a number of 5-4 decisions in the last few years where Scalia was the 5th vote. Replace him with a liberal and the decisions would swing the other way.

  11. #11
    Senior Member GGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,398
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewkowski View Post
    I don't think this is going to generate much discussion. I don't think a single person on this board thinks Trump is doing right with his BS tariffs.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewkowski View Post
    On the balance still better than Clinton. Barring nuclear war its hard to overstate how important the SCOTUS pick was. Or the tax cuts. Or the cutting of red tape and getting rid of bad regs. And yes, the tears of liberals.
    So you're willing to look the other way, and give Trump a pass on whack "trade policy" -- just like (R) in congress and other Trump apologists -- because you like some other stuff he's doing? It doesn't make sense (just like those corporate tax cuts that blew a $1 Trillion hole in our deficit). Either it's willful denial, cognitive dissonance, hypocrisy, or something else. Party loyalty? That can't mean much when traditional Republican principles are being trashed. Please explain!

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,483
    Quote Originally Posted by GGT View Post
    So you're willing to look the other way, and give Trump a pass on whack "trade policy" -- just like (R) in congress and other Trump apologists -- because you like some other stuff he's doing? It doesn't make sense (just like those corporate tax cuts that blew a $1 Trillion hole in our deficit). Either it's willful denial, cognitive dissonance, hypocrisy, or something else. Party loyalty? That can't mean much when traditional Republican principles are being trashed. Please explain!
    There is no looking the other way. Just like I didn't like Bush's medicare expansion or steel tariffs I'm never going to agree with everything a president from either party will do. I think Trump has a lot of flaws but I'm also not going to ignore the good his administration has already done.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •