Could Texas elect a Democratic Senator in November? Would be hilarious if they did and few more fitting Republican Senators it would be good to see lose than Cruz.
https://spectator.us/2018/09/will-cruz-lose/
Beto O'Rourke 2018
Could Texas elect a Democratic Senator in November? Would be hilarious if they did and few more fitting Republican Senators it would be good to see lose than Cruz.
https://spectator.us/2018/09/will-cruz-lose/
Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer
This is one of those races where if Cruz loses, he has only himself to blame. He is so disconnected from reality and his voters that every time Cruz attacks, Beto just ends up looking cooler.
"In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."
O'Rourke does look very impressive. He reminds me of Obama.
Yeah he's a real cool party dude.
https://www.gosanangelo.com/story/ne...st/1185118002/
The interesting thing about the great state of Texas is how they lured new business with low taxes and few regulations, but didn't realize that meant attracting young, diverse, entrepreneurial spirits who built new economic hubs (like Austin) but weren't GOP acolytes. Today's Texas candidate can't run on "God and Guns" like they did for generations. Well, they can try, but it may not work this time around, because all those young, new businesses/entrepreneurs come with new-fangled "liberal" ideas about pay equity, environmental protection, criminal justice reform, universal healthcare, sensible immigration/asylum, etc.
Texas may not turn blue this year, but it's definitely a shade of purple.
20 years ago. So what?
Seriously?
Lewk considered death an acceptable outcome to toothpaste theft. He is incapable of understanding how people grow, repent, and learn. Didn't we just have a thread where he was unable to understand the life long hardships of those who have a run in with the legal system?
"In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."
Given that Gaetz is a legislator I can't see how this would be a problem.
“Humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries, but in how those discoveries are applied to reduce inequity.”
— Bill Gates
I seem to recall Lewk having no issues with W Bush's history with alcohol etc
Or Trump's history with... everything.
Truth serves them
Embrace and defend her case
Part flattery, part threats
"For those who cling to this domination will partake in its fall"
It is impressive how some lucky Millennials remain intellectually unaware of where their monetary security comes from.The interesting thing about the great state of Texas is how they lured new business with low taxes and few regulations, but didn't realize that meant attracting young, diverse, entrepreneurial spirits who built new economic hubs (like Austin) but weren't GOP acolytes. Today's Texas candidate can't run on "God and Guns" like they did for generations. Well, they can try, but it may not work this time around, because all those young, new businesses/entrepreneurs come with new-fangled "liberal" ideas about pay equity, environmental protection, criminal justice reform, universal healthcare, sensible immigration/asylum, etc.
Texas may not turn blue this year, but it's definitely a shade of purple.
What monetary security is that?
Hope is the denial of reality
The one created by the Lizard People, of course
When the stars threw down their spears
And watered heaven with their tears:
Did he smile his work to see?
Did he who made the lamb make thee?
Twitter Link
He might not be the Zodiac killer but he sure is scum
“Humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries, but in how those discoveries are applied to reduce inequity.”
— Bill Gates
That cannot be allowed, surely.
United States.
https://www.politifact.com/texas/art...ight-deceive-/
“Humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries, but in how those discoveries are applied to reduce inequity.”
— Bill Gates
Truth serves them
Embrace and defend her case
Part flattery, part threats
"For those who cling to this domination will partake in its fall"
It was mostly a dig at OG's "cool" comment about Robert.
In comparison to Cruz, though? Still checks out.
Truth serves them
Embrace and defend her case
Part flattery, part threats
"For those who cling to this domination will partake in its fall"
Oh come on, he isn't a Trumpite. He just like the agony Trump causes to 'liberals', which appearantly includes everybody in this forum.
Greece shows us that there is a kind of politician worse than the ones that break their election promises; the ones that keep their election promises.
Rafael.
Lewk thinks himself witty cause he is following the suggestion from conservative talking heads (and Rafael's own attack ads) to use Robert. So we should address both candidates by their first names from this point.
"In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."
He's totally a Trumper, he just thinks he has plausible deniability by going "that time he said the entire state of Illinois fucks goats was too far in my opinion" every now and again.
Truth serves them
Embrace and defend her case
Part flattery, part threats
"For those who cling to this domination will partake in its fall"
You haven't being paying attention. I wanted both Rubio and Cruz over Trump. I didn't vote for him because he was personally distasteful. Am I happy that he's done some positive things (tax cuts, lowering the number of business regulations, the constant F U trolling of liberals) sure. But I'll be pushing the button for Libertarian again in 2020 if Trump runs again.
You'll get there by 2020.
Truth serves them
Embrace and defend her case
Part flattery, part threats
"For those who cling to this domination will partake in its fall"
Good question.
Dread, why are you using the "intellectually unaware" angle to suggest young people don't know what they want/expect from government?
If anything, it's another way around: it's impressive how many lucky Seniors remain intellectually *dishonest* about where their monetary security came from.
Because Millennials have been educated by an academic establishment addicted to the idea of an ever-larger government.
And they've been let-down by a government that botched the policy landscape post-2008, ensuring that Millennials would become a lost generation of job seekers.
Millenials like making unsupported generalizations about millenials.
Hope is the denial of reality
The problems that have resulted in the previous generation being unable or unwilling to retire started way before 2008, not that the obstructionist GOP helped matters over the past 10 years.
"In a field where an overlooked bug could cost millions, you want people who will speak their minds, even if they’re sometimes obnoxious about it."
I'm pretty sure most millennials are more in favor of socialist policies than in previous generations.
I extremely doubt it.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote