https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/29/p...rns/index.html
What a genuinely sad and pathetic little dingus. Imagine being so corrupt or so cowardly that you'd want to prop up this threat to national security.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/29/p...rns/index.html
What a genuinely sad and pathetic little dingus. Imagine being so corrupt or so cowardly that you'd want to prop up this threat to national security.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."
Yes, imagine knowing things that directly impact America's national security and doing nothing, Mr. Annoymous Official.These officials' concerns about the calls, and particularly Trump's deference to Putin, take on new resonance with reports the President may have learned in March that Russia had offered the Taliban bounties to kill US troops in Afghanistan -- and yet took no action.
When the sky above us fell
We descended into hell
Into kingdom come
I doubt nda's are in use in that setting.
Congratulations America
Is that even legal?
I doubt they could be enforced. I am going through the Bolton book and I don't think Bolton seems encumbered
Congratulations America
We're talking about three separate things, I think. I was responding to Steely and Being re. "Anonymous", who may have been compelled to sign a Trump-NDA (consensus seems to be that they're likely not enforceable against federal employees, but having that tested in court might be costly and inconvenient). The lawsuit against Bolton rests on standard govt. NDAs, and opinion is divided re. his likelihood of prevailing. The intelligence leaks are indeed a separate matter.
"One day, we shall die. All the other days, we shall live."