Exactly. So far all we have is the word of someone who is demonstratively acting in bad faith, accusing the other party of just that, with nothing to show for. If that is accepted as evidence, we're in bad shape.
Which is why I asked for any indication or support for that claim. And I am thinking, if there had been such a thing, it would have been spotlighted by now.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but it puts forward quite a weak case. And if you're going to accuse the EU publicly of acting in bad faith, I'm going to need a little more than: "Trust me, they are".