http://www.comcast.net/articles/news...tal.Copyright/
Here's a link to the Library of Congress news statement:Originally Posted by Joelle Tessler, AP
http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2010/10-169.html
Good deal, good deal. You'd think this was all already theoretically legal, though...
It's still a bit muddled, such as (4)... say someone breaks copyright protection in order to "correct security flaws" (ie: DRM that breaks or hinders your PC!) in order to "primarily to promote the security of the owner or operator of a computer" without by default "facilitat(ing) copyright infringement"?