Yes, cry you miserable piece of shit.

http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/video...ytJgvpE0SzD8d6

"Jaleel Smith-Riley tried to withdraw his guilty plea but the judge denied his request and sentenced him to life in prison without parole for killing a woman and injuring her boyfriend. Smith-Riley collapsed as he heard his sentence. During a hearing on Oct. 19, the judge denied Smith-Riley's motion to change his guilty plea. Judge Charles Kubicki then began the sentencing hearing. Smith-Riley cried and apologized."

It soothes the soul to know that this miserable useless piece of shit will never get out of prison. Innocent people are murdered every day in this country, partially because we coddle criminals over and over. It shouldn't require death to remove the animals from society, I haven't looked this guy up but I bet you this isn't his first brush with the law.

Maybe if you had gun control you'd have a lot less murders. Like you I've not looked this guy up but if it isn't his first brush with the law then why should people like Smith-Riley be easily armed? Maybe if criminals found it harder to get deadly weaponry then you'd have less daily murders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandBlade

Maybe if you had gun control you'd have a lot less murders. Like you I've not looked this guy up but if it isn't his first brush with the law then why should people like Smith-Riley be easily armed? Maybe if criminals found it harder to get deadly weaponry then you'd have less daily murders.

---

1. Even if we outlawed guns tomorrow (something no serious politician actually suggests) criminals could still get their hands on guns. There are over 300 million guns in the country.

2. Outlawing guns is against the constitution.

3. Other countries with high guns percapita don't have nearly as high a murder rate. There are other causes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lewkowski

1. Even if we outlawed guns tomorrow (something no serious politician actually suggests) criminals could still get their hands on guns. There are over 300 million guns in the country.

2. Outlawing guns is against the constitution.

3. Other countries with high guns percapita don't have nearly as high a murder rate. There are other causes.

---

Ignoring the fact that roughly half of all murders are crimes of passion. That means, A) they cannot be deterred. And B) the person will use what ever weapon is lying around.

1. Gun recalls, amnesties etc can quickly dent those numbers.

2. So change it.

3. Yours does though.

Yeah, let's just whip up an amendment for ya.

That is the process. Any attempt to circumvent that would be unconstitutional.

That was my point. The process is not easy, or garunteed to get what you want.

Of course, but if you don't try you don't get. 2016 has shown us that anything is possible however unlikely.

Sigh...your missing the fact that there is no strong support or even a hint of it to ban guns. We don't want too.

No I'm not. The only way to build support is for those who believe in it to campaign for it. And to do so honestly, campaigning to repeal the second amendment not trying to slip unconstitutional bills through Congress.

What part of that do you disagree with?

What I disagree with is that it just ain't gonna happen.

What is needed is a cultural change first, and that is not a quick process.

Don't think it's ever going to happen let alone be quick, but to get a cultural change you need people who are willing to campaign for the unthinkable. That way the unthinkable becomes the unbelievable becomes the unlikely. Then it's possible for a 2016 to happen and the unlikely becomes real.

But unless you are willing to push for the unthinkable then it can't happen.

Even if you're going to compare this to Trump: last I checked, he doesn't have the support of 2/3 of Congress and 3/4 of all states.

Neither did prohibition at one point.

Nor did the repeal of prohibition at another.

Nor did many other amendments.

Didn't stop people campaigning then eventually making it possible.