What you're talking about has nothing to do with "Freee Trade", but price comparisons. We've talked about sugar tariffs before, but only in a policy context. As a consumer, you'd most likely choose the "cheapest" sugar, even if it came from another nation that subsidized sugar production, and lobbied for no or low import taxes or tariffs.
Local pricing isn't the "distortion". Short term and disconnected thinking is the real problem. ie, it may save millions of consumers and billions of dollars to buy sugar from Brazil, or winter-time citrus from Mexico...but it won't translate into domestic jobs. That's the flaw of globalization that many don't dare to mention. iPads and iPhones are already pricey, and wouldn't be affordable if not assembled in China, with their cheap labor. Many of our manufactured goods operate that way....from athletic shoes to clothing or household goods...to automobiles, and their operating fuel.
People who buy a <more expensive> hybrid or electric fueled car are betting their nation has cheaper electricity and/or a more advanced lithium battery industry, compared to cars that only run on refined oil/gas. Some upgrade to a great engine that runs on premium gas or diesel, but that's hardly the best foundation for a national energy policy.
The USD is considered the world's reserve currency. Oil contracts are traded in USD. Foreign currencies are pegged against the USD. Like it or not, that's the way it is.Geegee, the US is neither a lender of first resort (that's private companies generally) nor even accurately the "lender of last resort" which is the correct phrase used in this context.



Reply With Quote