I respect consistency. If you can charge one gender more for one thing than you should be able to charge the other gender more for something else. My direct view is that insurance is risk based pricing should be allowed along gender lines. However if someone thinks that risk based pricing shouldn't be allowed on gender lines and *remains consistent with that belief* I can respect the argument and don't think they are hypocritical piece of shit.
The problem that I have is when people are fully OK with charging men more for something but get all pissy if women are charged more for something.





Reply With Quote