Danish scientist Niels Harrit talks about WTC demolition

Yeah, I think it's through the control panel or something.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFWMh...eature=channel

Families of 9/11 victims are not getting answers and they want civil court to judge this.

How do you explain this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdQh18kvpRU&feature=related

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ar81

I want to point out that at least 1150 architects and engineers have signed a petition calling for a new investigation, .

---

That leaves millions of -smarter- architects that haven't called for a new useless investigation through an inane petition

AR81, answer me this. You claim it was a controlled demolition, so:

How did they (whoever you want they to be) rig the buildings without the tens of thousands of people working there noticing? Without the planes destroying the rigging at the floor they impacted? And with regard to WTC7 how did they rig that building without the firefighters who were trying to save that building for hours noticing?

Please answer these questions not by posting a link, or linking a video. That is the cop-out option, especially when you are blaming people they believe whatever they are told. You tell me how you figure they did that.

The building did not "implode" this never happened. Watch footage again and see bus sized chunks of stteel falling all around. See widnows blown out blocks away by the wave of dust and debris. Also, that second video is absolute tripe. Removing the external supports from a simulation increases the odds of the building falling sideways.

Building 7 had a 100+ story skyscraper fall on it, that's what happened...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ziggy Stardust

AR81, answer me this. You claim it was a controlled demolition, so:

How did they (whoever you want they to be) rig the buildings without the tens of thousands of people working there noticing? Without the planes destroying the rigging at the floor they impacted? And with regard to WTC7 how did they rig that building without the firefighters who were trying to save that building for hours noticing?

Please answer these questions not by posting a link, or linking a video. That is the cop-out option, especially when you are blaming people they believe whatever they are told. You tell me how you figure they did that.

---

How do normal people or firefighters recognize nanothermite? If they cannot see it, they could not spot the problem.

Right, just one more.

Do you consider that an adequate reply to my questions?

How did they (whoever you want they to be) rig the buildings without the tens of thousands of people working there noticing?
Who knows how nanothermite looks?

Without the planes destroying the rigging at the floor they impacted?
They must have had some sort of thermal isolation, which also may explain the unexploded tehrmite.

And with regard to WTC7 how did they rig that building without the firefighters who were trying to save that building for hours noticing?
Who knows how nanothermite looks?

That made me giggle.

You're so cute when you giggle.

That made me giggle more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ar81

How did they (whoever you want they to be) rig the buildings without the tens of thousands of people working there noticing?
Who knows how nanothermite looks?

Without the planes destroying the rigging at the floor they impacted?
They must have had some sort of thermal isolation, which also may explain the unexploded tehrmite.

And with regard to WTC7 how did they rig that building without the firefighters who were trying to save that building for hours noticing?
Who knows how nanothermite looks?

---

Thank you :)

No further questions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ar81

How do normal people or firefighters recognize nanothermite? If they cannot see it, they could not spot the problem.

---

Everything typed by your hands in this thread is the representation of an utter abomination unto rational thinking human beings...

Maybe it's the result of 1000 monkeys typing on 1000 keyboards?

They should make all buildings out of thermal insulation. I hear it is plane-impact-proof.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ar81

How did they (whoever you want they to be) rig the buildings without the tens of thousands of people working there noticing?
Who knows how nanothermite looks?

Without the planes destroying the rigging at the floor they impacted?
They must have had some sort of thermal isolation, which also may explain the unexploded tehrmite.

And with regard to WTC7 how did they rig that building without the firefighters who were trying to save that building for hours noticing?
Who knows how nanothermite looks?

---

Stop it! You don't even know what termite is! It's reddish-brown, it doesn't explode!

Indeed, termite is rather tanned living in Australia and all. So reddish-brown is about right. As to his propensity to explode i'm not too sure but he generally seems pretty calm.

Nanotermite is his little son.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ar81

Just think about what could destroy the buildings in that particular way.

---

A plane, loaded with a shit load of fuel, hurling itself into the building at - say - 480/500mph? :bulb:

Care to tango?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cracky

Stop it! You don't even know what termite is! It's reddish-brown, it doesn't explode!

---

As loathe as I am to admit it, Nano-Thermite could indeed be classified as an explosive. Thermite isn't, that's true.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metasta...ular_composite

I've experienced the effect of going from Copper powder to Copper dust first hand. The former reacts rather slowly with Sulfur, the latter ignites spectacularly.

AR like youtube vids.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHjISnLlL3I

Ugh. The idea of "debunking" the nano-thermite "theory" is just vile.

Yeah, I also wonder how you might find microscopic aluminum oxide and iron oxide at a site where an aluminum airliner crashed into a skyscraper with steel support beams... and ignited thousands of gallons of jet fuel.

So many fucking morons in the world, not nearly enough bullets.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CitizenCain

So many fucking morons in the world, not nearly enough bullets.

---

And now the fucking Islamo-socialist in the White House is trying to rid the world of nukes, too :( God fucking damnit!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CitizenCain

So many fucking morons in the world, not nearly enough bullets.

---

Only one way to find out if this is true ....... FIIIIGGGGHHHTTTTT!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lor

Only one way to find out if this is true ....... FIIIIGGGGHHHTTTTT!

---

Actually, counting works pretty well too.

Even if I limited myself to only taking out the worst of humanity, the bottom of the barrel, so to speak, I'm still a few billion rounds short, even assuming a 100% kill rate... which I'm pretty sure is impossible with a .50 MG anyway.

Nope, sadly the only solution is to win that contract to store in my bunker decommission those 500 warheads... that should get me pretty close, and I can mop up any survivors with my small arms. Of course, that nuclear fallout will be pretty nasty, but you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs, so I'll just have to learn to live with it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Khendraja'aro

As loathe as I am to admit it, Nano-Thermite could indeed be classified as an explosive. Thermite isn't, that's true.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metasta...ular_composite

I've experienced the effect of going from Copper powder to Copper dust first hand. The former reacts rather slowly with Sulfur, the latter ignites spectacularly.

---

I'm pretty sure it's still deflagaration though, definitely not a high-explosive, which is what really matters in these situations.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CitizenCain

Actually, counting works pretty well too.

Even if I limited myself to only taking out the worst of humanity, the bottom of the barrel, so to speak, I'm still a few billion rounds short, even assuming a 100% kill rate... which I'm pretty sure is impossible with a .50 MG anyway.

Nope, sadly the only solution is to win that contract to store in my bunker decommission those 500 warheads... that should get me pretty close, and I can mop up any survivors with my small arms. Of course, that nuclear fallout will be pretty nasty, but you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs, so I'll just have to learn to live with it.

---

It's only a couple of grays, just walk it off you big pussy