Results 1 to 30 of 63

Thread: Lesson... Don't Steal

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    So going to the bank robbery scenario if a bank robbers incompetence led to a security guard shooting dead one of his accomplices then that should be a mitigating factor? That's absurd.

    Furthermore doing something good is only mitigation if it was deliberate. If a drunk driver kills a kidnapper with the child he'd kidnapped would the death of the kidnapper mitigate the child's death?
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    So going to the bank robbery scenario if a bank robbers incompetence led to a security guard shooting dead one of his accomplices then that should be a mitigating factor? That's absurd.
    So is charging someone with murdering their friend for him getting shot by the security guard. Apparently, under this interpretation of the law, if you attempt to rob someone and they beat the crap out of you with a baseball bat, you're guilty of aggravated assault against yourself. Better hope the guy you attempted to rob doesn't start spitting racial epithets at you, that'll give the assault charge against yourself a hate crime add-on.

    Using felony-murder in this way is lunacy. It's also apparently not uncommon. Part of the whole schtick DAs over here have of throwing every conceivable charge they can muster to encourage plea-bargaining. I know there's a case in California which is being pursued along fairly similar lines to the one Lewk cited.
    Last edited by LittleFuzzy; 07-29-2014 at 02:15 AM.
    Last night as I lay in bed, looking up at the stars, I thought, “Where the hell is my ceiling?"

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleFuzzy View Post
    So is charging someone with murdering their friend for him getting shot by the security guard. Apparently, under this interpretation of the law, if you attempt to rob someone and they beat the crap out of you with a baseball bat, you're guilty of aggravated assault against yourself. Better hope the guy you attempted to rob doesn't start spitting racial epithets at you, that'll give the assault charge against yourself a hate crime add-on.

    Using felony-murder in this way is lunacy. .
    Precisely.
    Last edited by Timbuk2; 07-29-2014 at 12:23 PM.

  4. #4
    Let sleeping tigers lie Khendraja'aro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the forests of the night
    Posts
    6,239
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleFuzzy View Post
    So is charging someone with murdering their friend for him getting shot by the security guard.
    Well, they can't very well charge the friend with murdering himself now, can they? Someone has to take the blame, after all!
    When the stars threw down their spears
    And watered heaven with their tears:
    Did he smile his work to see?
    Did he who made the lamb make thee?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleFuzzy View Post
    So is charging someone with murdering their friend for him getting shot by the security guard. Apparently, under this interpretation of the law, if you attempt to rob someone and they beat the crap out of you with a baseball bat, you're guilty of aggravated assault against yourself. Better hope the guy you attempted to rob doesn't start spitting racial epithets at you, that'll give the assault charge against yourself a hate crime add-on.

    Using felony-murder in this way is lunacy. It's also apparently not uncommon. Part of the whole schtick DAs over here have of throwing every conceivable charge they can muster to encourage plea-bargaining. I know there's a case in California which is being pursued along fairly similar lines to the one Lewk cited.
    The law is absolutely crystal clear and not being misapplied. You start a violent crime and it results in loss of life then you are responsible for murder even if you did not pull the trigger. The life would not have been lost had you not started your felony. Don't want to be charged with that? Don't start violent felonies. Simples.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ominous Gamer View Post
    ℬeing upset is understandable, but be upset at yourself for poor planning, not at the world by acting like a spoiled bitch during an interview.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by RandBlade View Post
    The law is absolutely crystal clear and not being misapplied. You start a violent crime and it results in loss of life then you are responsible for murder even if you did not pull the trigger. The life would not have been lost had you not started your felony. Don't want to be charged with that? Don't start violent felonies. Simples.
    Liberals won't agree because criminals are precious little snowflakes that society has 'failed' to properly educate and raise. Its not their fault they are committing crime!

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewkowski View Post
    Liberals



  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Timbuk2 View Post


    Oh please. What part of limited government = opposite of what liberals want do you not understand?

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewkowski View Post
    Oh please. What part of limited government = opposite of what liberals want do you not understand?


    Your nebulous caricature of 'liberals' is so misplaced and simplistic you missed the point entirely.

    Keep bashing your silly little strawman Lewk; it has no basis in reality.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •