Quote Originally Posted by Steely Glint View Post
The key point of Abramson's critique is that the NYT is misreporting several aspects of the latest Flynn developments, and uncritically repeating the Trump administration line about the investigation. In one example, he says they've mistated the exact nature of of what Mueller has been charged with investigating, then provides a document to back up this assertion.

If the critique is true (and, honestly, the above example seems pretty damning unless he literally made up the document), in what universe does that constitute neutrality and non-editorial reporting?
"Whether anyone around Mr. Trump was involved in Russian efforts to undermine Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign" and "to investigate Russian interference with the 2016 Presidential election and related matters" seem quite comparable lines.